In re Davis

134 S. Ct. 188, 187 L. Ed. 2d 269, 571 U.S. 814, 82 U.S.L.W. 3191, 2013 WL 3153421, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 L. Ed. 2d 671
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 2013·No. No. 12–10869.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Davis, 134 S. Ct. 188, 187 L. Ed. 2d 269, 571 U.S. 814, 82 U.S.L.W. 3191, 2013 WL 3153421, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5158 (U.S. 2013).

134 S. Ct. 188 (In re Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)