In re Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Davis

874 A.2d 622

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 13, 2005

DocketNo. 1004 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 874 A.2d 622 (In re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Davis, 874 A.2d 622 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on March 15, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Reed James Davis to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Reed James Davis is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on March 15, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Reed James Davis to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Reed James Davis is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

874 A.2d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-pa-2005.