In re Davis

749 A.2d 440
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 23, 2000
DocketNo. 561 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 749 A.2d 440 (In re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Davis, 749 A.2d 440 (Pa. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2000, Hardge Davis, Jr., having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated October 6, 1999; the said Hardge Davis, Jr., having been directed on January 13, 2000, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Hardge Davis, Jr., is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
749 A.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-pa-2000.