In re Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Davis

690 N.E.2d 1289, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 995

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1998

Docket98-98

StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 1289 (In re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Davis, 690 N.E.2d 1289, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 995 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Paulding App. No. 11-97-6. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 24,1997:

“On motion of the appellants to certify a conflict, the judges of this court find that the judgment in this case, upon which they have agreed, is in conflict with the judgment pronounced upon the same question by the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Appellate District in the case of In re [Omosun] Children (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 813 [667 N.E.2d 431],

“The rule of law on which the conflict exists is whether the seven-day limit within which a juvenile court must enter its disposition of a child adjudicated as abused, neglected or dependent under R.C. 2151.35 also applies to motions filed by an agency under R.C. 2151.414 prior to the September 1996 amendment to that statute.”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 98-50, infra.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI