In re Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Davis

60 A.D.2d 613, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14578

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 613 (In re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Davis, 60 A.D.2d 613, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner (1) to withdraw the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, on the ground that the respondent has been automatically disbarred by reason of his conviction and sentence for a felony in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on September 23, 1976, (2) to vacate this court’s order dated January 11, 1977 which authorized the institution of the proceeding against respondent and (3) to strike respondent’s name from the rolls of attorneys by reason of said conviction. Motion granted. The motion to confirm the Referee’s report is deemed withdrawn and the order authorizing the proceeding is deemed recalled and vacated. The respondent is disbarred. The clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, forthwith (Matter of Chu, [614]*61442 NY2d 490). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner (1) to withdraw the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, on the ground that the respondent has been automatically disbarred by reason of his conviction and sentence for a felony in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on September 23, 1976, (2) to vacate this court’s order dated January 11, 1977 which authorized the institution of the proceeding against respondent and (3) to strike respondent’s name from the rolls of attorneys by reason of said conviction. Motion granted. The motion to confirm the Referee’s report is deemed withdrawn and the order authorizing the proceeding is deemed recalled and vacated. The respondent is disbarred. The clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, forthwith (Matter of Chu, [614]*61442 NY2d 490). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 613, 402 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack