In Re Davis

976 A.2d 173, 2009 WL 1952005
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 9, 2009
Docket09-BS-643
StatusPublished

This text of 976 A.2d 173 (In Re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Davis, 976 A.2d 173, 2009 WL 1952005 (D.C. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Michael RJ Davis, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 9th day of July, 2009,

ORDERED that the said Michael RJ Davis is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tabaka v. District of Columbia
976 A.2d 173 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 A.2d 173, 2009 WL 1952005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-dc-2009.