In re Davis Collamore
53 F. 1006, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2439
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 9, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
(orally.) I think the imported articles are clearly paintings, and are not porcelain ware or placques. The decision of the’board is affirmed, and it is directed that the articles be classified for duty under paragraph 465.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Davis Collamore, 53 F. 1006, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2439 (circtsdny 1893).
53 F. 1006 (In re Davis Collamore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMillen v. McMillen
784 N.E.2d 1130 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2003)