In Re: Davis
This text of In Re: Davis (In Re: Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1845
In Re: RALPH D. DAVIS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00254-TSE-1)
Submitted: November 4, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph D. Davis, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ralph D. Davis petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion to unseal a search warrant. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. On November 1, 2010,
the district court issued an order unsealing the affidavit in
support of the search warrant, the application for the search
warrant, and the search warrant itself. Accordingly, because
the district court has recently resolved the motion in question,
we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-ca4-2010.