In re Davidson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Davidson

235 A.D. 773

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Davidson. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D. 311 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Motion for reinstatement granted. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. ‘ Joseph S. Blume & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Pilot Reinsurance Company of New York, Appellant.— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the interrogatories and cross-interrogatories settled by overruling plaintiff’s objections to the direct interrogatories, and settling the same as presented. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reinstatement granted. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. ‘ Joseph S. Blume & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Pilot Reinsurance Company of New York, Appellant.— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the interrogatories and cross-interrogatories settled by overruling plaintiff’s objections to the direct interrogatories, and settling the same as presented. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.

In re Davidson, 235 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

235 A.D. 773 (In re Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.