In re Davidson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Davidson

868 A.2d 1007, 182 N.J. 587, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 209

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 9, 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-259, concluding that MARVIN S. DAVIDSON of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating Rule 1:21-6 (record-keeping violations), and RPC 1.15 (failure to safekeep property), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARVIN S. DAVIDSON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-259, concluding that MARVIN S. DAVIDSON of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating Rule 1:21-6 (record-keeping violations), and RPC 1.15 (failure to safekeep property), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARVIN S. DAVIDSON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Davidson, 868 A.2d 1007, 182 N.J. 587, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 2005).

Pincite

868 A.2d 1007 (In re Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.