in Re David Rose, Dana Rose and Bryan James

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 8, 2007
• Docket: 14-07-00143-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00143-CV

IN RE DAVID ROSE, DANA ROSE, AND BRYAN JAMES,

 Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

On February 21, 2007, relators, David Rose, Dana Rose, and Bryan James, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, complaining of rulings made by respondent, the Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding judge of the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, that relate to an order granting real party-in-interest=s motion for partial summary judgment.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see  also  Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

Relators have failed to establish that the trial court=s rulings are an abuse of discretion for which they have no adequate remedy by appeal.  See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005).  Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.                                                                                        

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.