in Re David Rodriguez and Phillip Rodriguez
This text of in Re David Rodriguez and Phillip Rodriguez (in Re David Rodriguez and Phillip Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 4, 2019
No. 04-19-00109-CV
IN RE David RODRIGUEZ and Phillip Rodriguez
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
On March 1, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition. After considering the petition, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The emergency motion to stay is DENIED AS MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on March 4, 2019.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-23741, styled David Rodriguez, Individually and As Next Friend of Phillip Rodriguez, a Minor v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, et al., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Peter Sakai presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re David Rodriguez and Phillip Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-rodriguez-and-phillip-rodriguez-texapp-2019.