In re David R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re David R.

119 A.D.2d 677, 500 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55595

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 677 (In re David R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re David R., 119 A.D.2d 677, 500 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In three child neglect proceedings, the petitioner St. Dominic’s Home appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (De Phillips, J.), entered March 13, 1985, which dismissed the proceedings, without prejudice, for failure to make out prima facie cases.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, petitions reinstated, and matters remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for new fact-finding hearings.

During the course of the petitioner’s case and before it had been completed, the Family Court dismissed these proceedings for failure to make out prima facie cases. Since this was error, the matters are remitted for new fact-finding hearings. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In three child neglect proceedings, the petitioner St. Dominic’s Home appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (De Phillips, J.), entered March 13, 1985, which dismissed the proceedings, without prejudice, for failure to make out prima facie cases.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, petitions reinstated, and matters remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for new fact-finding hearings.

During the course of the petitioner’s case and before it had been completed, the Family Court dismissed these proceedings for failure to make out prima facie cases. Since this was error, the matters are remitted for new fact-finding hearings. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 677, 500 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-r-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack