In re David N.
92 A.D.2d 739, 461 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17059
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1983·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing is insufficient as a matter of law to establish beyond a reasonable doubt (see Matter of Richard S., 27 NY2d 802; Matter of Terry UU, 52 AD2d 683) that appellant is a person in need of supervision within the meaning of the Family Court Act (§ 712, subd [b]; § 732). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J. — person in need of supervision.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re David N., 92 A.D.2d 739, 461 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
92 A.D.2d 739 (In re David N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Diallo H.
94 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re Freeman B.
93 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)