in Re David Michael Sheid
This text of in Re David Michael Sheid (in Re David Michael Sheid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-051-CV
IN RE DAVID MICHAEL SHEID RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because relator has an adequate remedy by bill of review. See In re Barber , 982 S.W.2d 364, 368 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Defee v. Defee , 966 S.W.2d 719, 722 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL B: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 28, 2008
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re David Michael Sheid, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-michael-sheid-texapp-2008.