in Re David Lee Victorick

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: November 6, 2013
• Docket: 09-13-00483-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________

NO. 09-13-00483-CR _________________

IN RE DAVID LEE VICTORICK

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator David Lee Victorick filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this

Court. In three issues, Victorick complains that the presiding judge of the Second

Administrative Judicial Region denied his motion to recuse the trial judge.

On the record before us, we conclude that we lack mandamus authority over

the presiding judge’s denial of the motion to recuse the trial judge. See Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re ES Energy Solutions, LP, No. 05-10-

01158-CV, 2010 WL 3720219, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 24, 2010, orig.

proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Davidson, No. 09-07-380 CV, 2007 WL 2324321, at

*1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 16, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, we dismiss Victorick’s petition for writ of mandamus.

1 PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered November 6, 2013 Do not publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.