in Re David James

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 6, 2006·No. 01-06-00545-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 6, 2006






In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-06-00545-CR

____________


IN RE DAVID JAMES, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator, David James, has filed in this Court a pro se petition for writ of mandamus asking that we order respondent to rule on pro se motions that he filed to obtain a portion of a reporter’s record in cause number 21928. Relator requests that this Court compel the trial court to provide him with a free copy of the reporter’s record in case number 21928 in which relator was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. Relator’s conviction in cause number 21928 is on appeal and is pending in this Court.

               Relator is represented by appointed counsel in the appeal of his conviction. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. In re Cooks, No. 06-04-00053-CV, slip op. at 2 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Apr. 29, 2004, orig. proceeding); Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.       

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Hanks, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re David James, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

in Re David James (in Re David James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)