In re David H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re David H.

255 A.D.2d 264, 680 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12721

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 264 (In re David H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re David H., 255 A.D.2d 264, 680 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrence McElrath, J.), entered on or about May 22, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent for committing acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by vacating the finding of acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding of acts which would constitute attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490), including testimony that appellant had a defaced and loaded, but inoperable, handgun hidden on his person and then tried to discard it when he realized he was being followed by the police (see, Matter of Lavar D., 90 NY2d 963, 965; People v Saunders, 85 NY2d 339, 341-342), and the court, as fact-finder, was entitled to discredit appellant’s testimony that, although he knew the weapon was loaded, he believed it to be inoperable (see, Matter of Isaac Q., 217 AD2d 410, 411). However, the presentment agency failed to submit any evidence that appellant intended to use the handgun against another person, and such a finding is against the weight of the evidence, which shows that appellant found the gun only minutes before being confronted by the police and merely planned to take it home. Therefore, that portion of the petition charging acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is dismissed. Since appellant’s placement has expired, there is no need for a remand for further dispositional proceedings. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrence McElrath, J.), entered on or about May 22, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent for committing acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by vacating the finding of acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding of acts which would constitute attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490), including testimony that appellant had a defaced and loaded, but inoperable, handgun hidden on his person and then tried to discard it when he realized he was being followed by the police (see, Matter of Lavar D., 90 NY2d 963, 965; People v Saunders, 85 NY2d 339, 341-342), and the court, as fact-finder, was entitled to discredit appellant’s testimony that, although he knew the weapon was loaded, he believed it to be inoperable (see, Matter of Isaac Q., 217 AD2d 410, 411). However, the presentment agency failed to submit any evidence that appellant intended to use the handgun against another person, and such a finding is against the weight of the evidence, which shows that appellant found the gun only minutes before being confronted by the police and merely planned to take it home. Therefore, that portion of the petition charging acts constituting attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is dismissed. Since appellant’s placement has expired, there is no need for a remand for further dispositional proceedings. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 264, 680 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-h-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack