In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas (In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00513-CR
IN RE David GARZA
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator, David Garza, filed his petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying record on
June 30, 2026. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show
(1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is
no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992)
(orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes that Garza
has not shown he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009CRS000735D4, styled The State of Texas v. David Garza, pending in the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable David E. Garcia presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-garza-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.