In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)·Decided July 8, 2026·No. 04-26-00513-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00513-CR

IN RE David GARZA

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2026 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator, David Garza, filed his petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying record on June 30, 2026. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes that Garza has not shown he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009CRS000735D4, styled The State of Texas v. David Garza, pending in the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable David E. Garcia presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas (In Re David Garza v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)