In Re David Disraeli v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re David Disraeli v. the State of Texas (In Re David Disraeli v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00345-CV
In re David Disraeli
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the justice
court’s allegedly improper failure to enforce an arbitration provision in the underlying matter.
We lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace or justice court
unless it is necessary to preserve our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (writ power of
court of appeals); In re Goad, No. 03-23-00387-CV, 2023 WL 4604672 (Tex. App.—Austin
July 18, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing Twenty First Century Holdings, Inc.
v. Precision Geothermal Drilling, L.L.C., No. 03-13-00081-CV, 2015 WL 1882267, at *6 (Tex.
App.—Austin Apr. 23, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue
writ of mandamus against judge of justice court unless necessary to preserve jurisdiction);
Rodriguez v. Womack, No. 14–10–01213–CV, 2012 WL 19659 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.]
Jan. 5, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (noting court of appeals’ lack of jurisdiction to issue
mandamus against justice court). Relator does not argue or show that a writ of mandamus is
necessary to preserve our jurisdiction in this matter. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the justice court in this case. See In re Smith, 355 S.W.3d 901, 901–
02 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2011, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (where appellants did not argue or
show writ was necessary to preserve jurisdiction, appellate court lacked jurisdiction to issue writ
of mandamus against justice of peace).
Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we dismiss the petition for
want of jurisdiction and dismiss pending motions as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis
Filed: April 22, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re David Disraeli v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-disraeli-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.