In Re David Dick v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 1, 2025
Docket01-24-00585-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re David Dick v. the State of Texas (In Re David Dick v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re David Dick v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 1, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00585-CV ——————————— IN RE DAVID DICK, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, David Dick, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the

trial court’s July 24, 2024 order denying his motion to dismiss under Texas Rule of

Civil Procedure 91a.1 In his motion, relator sought dismissal of the claims asserted

by real party in interest, Allied Trust Insurance Company (Allied), in the underlying

1 See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a. lawsuit.2 On December 12, 2024, this Court granted in part and denied in part

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Allied filed a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration

requesting that the Court “withdraw and/or vacate” the December 12, 2024 opinion

“and affirm the trial court’s [o]rder denying [r]elator’s Rule 91a motion to dismiss

in full.” While the motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration were

pending, on April 23, 2025, the parties filed a “Joint Notice of Settlement,” notifying

the Court that the parties “reached a settlement agreement resolving all matters in

controversy.” The parties further notified the Court that “[n]o further action from

this Court [was] necessary.”

We withdraw our December 12, 2024 opinion and issue this opinion in its

stead. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c) (“In dismissing a proceeding, the appellate court

will determine whether to withdraw any opinion it has already issued.”).

We construe the parties’ April 23, 2025 Joint Notice of Settlement as a motion

to dismiss the original proceeding as moot pursuant to the parties’ settlement

agreement resolving all matters in controversy. We grant the parties’ joint motion

and dismiss the original proceeding as moot pursuant to the settlement agreement.

2 The underlying case is Allied Trust Insurance Company v. David Dick and Dick Law Firm, PLLC, Cause No. 1227457, in the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Kovach presiding.

2 We dismiss all pending motions, including Allied’s motion for rehearing and motion

for en banc reconsideration, as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.3

3 The Honorable Peter Kelly and the Honorable Richard Hightower, former Justices of this Court, were members of the Panel when the original proceeding was submitted and participated in the decision. Their terms of office expired on December 31, 2024, and they did not participate in this decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re David Dick v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-dick-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.