In Re David Darwish v. the State of Texas

Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)

In Re David Darwish v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

DecidedFebruary 11, 2026

Docket03-26-00144-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re David Darwish v. the State of Texas (In Re David Darwish v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re David Darwish v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00144-CV

In re David Darwish

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of an allegedly

improper sanctions motion pending before the justice court. We lack jurisdiction to issue a writ

of mandamus against a justice of the peace or justice court unless it is necessary to preserve our

jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (writ power of court of appeals); In re Goad, No. 03-

23-00387-CV, 2023 WL 4604672 (Tex. App.—Austin July 18, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem.

op.) (citing Twenty First Century Holdings, Inc. v. Precision Geothermal Drilling, L.L.C.,

No. 03-13-00081-CV, 2015 WL 1882267, at *6 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 23, 2015, no pet.)

(mem. op.) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against judge of

justice court unless necessary to preserve jurisdiction); Rodriguez v. Womack, No. 14–10–

01213–CV, 2012 WL 19659 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 5, 2012, pet. denied) (mem.

op.) (noting court of appeals’ lack of jurisdiction to issue mandamus against justice court).

Relator does not argue or show that a writ of mandamus is necessary to preserve our jurisdiction

in this matter. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the justice court in this case. See In re Smith, 355 S.W.3d 901, 901–02 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2011, orig.

proceeding) (per curiam) (where appellants did not argue or show writ was necessary to preserve

jurisdiction, appellate court lacked jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against justice of

peace).

Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we dismiss the petition for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________ Karin Crump, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Filed: February 11, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI