in Re David Cepeda Jones
This text of in Re David Cepeda Jones (in Re David Cepeda Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00948-CV
IN RE David Cepeda JONES
Original Mandamus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 11, 2006
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DISMISSED AS MOOT
On December 30, 2005, David Cepeda Jones filed a petition for a writ of mandamus complaining that Ed Schweninger of the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office has failed to act on civil “claim letters” submitted by Jones.
This court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the district attorney or employees of her office clerks unless it is shown that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004). Jones has made no such allegation or showing. We therefore dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.
No costs shall be assessed against relator because he is indigent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re David Cepeda Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-cepeda-jones-texapp-2006.