In re David C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re David C.

55 A.D.2d 868, 390 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10057

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 4, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 868 (In re David C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re David C., 55 A.D.2d 868, 390 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, New York County, dated November 4, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the determination of temporary custody, and such custody restored to the Commissioner of Social Services, without costs and without disbursements, and otherwise affirmed. We grant leave to appeal on this interlocutory matter. As a result of intense marital discord between the mother and the stepfather, the child is estranged from his mother (the natural father is deceased). With conflicting contentions that the child was neglected, a stipulation was entered into before Shainswit, J., in which the parties agreed that there be limited contact between any and all of them and the child. Among the parties are the Potruches, friends of the stepfather, to whom temporary custody was thereafter awarded by the Family Court. There was no need for the interlocutory determination on the simple technical question of custody. The

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, New York County, dated November 4, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the determination of temporary custody, and such custody restored to the Commissioner of Social Services, without costs and without disbursements, and otherwise affirmed. We grant leave to appeal on this interlocutory matter. As a result of intense marital discord between the mother and the stepfather, the child is estranged from his mother (the natural father is deceased). With conflicting contentions that the child was neglected, a stipulation was entered into before Shainswit, J., in which the parties agreed that there be limited contact between any and all of them and the child. Among the parties are the Potruches, friends of the stepfather, to whom temporary custody was thereafter awarded by the Family Court. There was no need for the interlocutory determination on the simple technical question of custody. The

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 868, 390 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-c-nyappdiv-1977.