In re David C.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re David C.

616 A.2d 412, 328 Md. 634, 1992 Md. LEXIS 184

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 10, 1992

DocketMisc. No. 34

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 616 A.2d 412 (In re David C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re David C., 616 A.2d 412, 328 Md. 634, 1992 Md. LEXIS 184 (Md. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners for admission to the Bar of Maryland of David Paul Caravaggio, it is this 10th day of December, 1992

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the favorable recommendation of the State Board be, and it is hereby, adopted, and it is further

ORDERED that the said applicant, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners for admission to the Bar of Maryland of David Paul Caravaggio, it is this 10th day of December, 1992

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the favorable recommendation of the State Board be, and it is hereby, adopted, and it is further

ORDERED that the said applicant, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 A.2d 412, 328 Md. 634, 1992 Md. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-c-md-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack