in Re: David Andrew Douglas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
Docket13-07-00698-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: David Andrew Douglas (in Re: David Andrew Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: David Andrew Douglas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-698-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

IN RE: DAVID ANDREW DOUGLAS



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
_______________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



On September 4, 2007, in the above cause, relator, David Andrew Douglas, filed a document titled "Notice and Demand Commercial Offer with Affidavit in Support" which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition, its attachments including an affidavit of default and stipulation commercial offer commercial law notice, an affidavit re[garding] denial of notary service, and an affidavit of service, as well as documents filed on November 13, 2007, including a commercial affidavit and two first notices of debt, and is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 29th day of November, 2007.

1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: David Andrew Douglas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-andrew-douglas-texapp-2007.