in Re David A. Chaumette

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re David A. Chaumette. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 13799
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 2013·No. 01-13-00964-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00964-CV Style: In re David A. Chaumette * Date motion filed : December 3, 2013 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file response Party filing motion: Real party in interest Document to be filed: Response to petition for writ of mandamus

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 4, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: December 4, 2013 Date Requested: December 11, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: December 11, 2013  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Real party in interest’s motion for extension is granted in part and denied in part. Real party in interest’s response is ordered to be filed no later than December 11, 2013. Real party in interest’s request for other relief is denied. Real party in interest is directed to include arguments regarding the Court’s jurisdiction in its response.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 4, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re David A. Chaumette, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re David A. Chaumette (in Re David A. Chaumette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.