in Re: Dave Todd, Iii
This text of in Re: Dave Todd, Iii (in Re: Dave Todd, Iii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
CAUSE NUMBER 13-05-00656-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
IN RE: DAVE TODD, III
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relator, Dave Todd, III, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 24, 2005. The Court requested that the real party in interest, the State of Texas by and through the District Attorney in and for Nueces County, Texas, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 14, 2005. The response was filed on November 10, 2005.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and response, is of the opinion that this original proceeding should be DENIED as moot. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 22nd day of November, 2005.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Dave Todd, Iii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dave-todd-iii-texapp-2005.