In re: Dauberman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 10-1363·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1363

In Re: WENDY B. DAUBERMAN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cr-00040-HEH-2)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendy B. Dauberman, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wendy B. Dauberman petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. She seeks an order

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review

of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court

has denied Dauberman’s § 2255 motion, without prejudice.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Dauberman, (4th Cir. 2010).

In re: Dauberman (In re: Dauberman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related