In re Dashoff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Dashoff

674 A.2d 1049

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 17, 1996

DocketNo. 180 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File No. C1-95-1242

StatusPublished

This text of 674 A.2d 1049 (In re Dashoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dashoff, 674 A.2d 1049 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 1996, Alan D. Dashoff having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New [1050]*1050Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated November 1, 1995; the said Alan D. Dashoff having been directed on February 5, 1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Alan D. Dashoff is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 1996, Alan D. Dashoff having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New [1050]*1050Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated November 1, 1995; the said Alan D. Dashoff having been directed on February 5, 1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Alan D. Dashoff is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 A.2d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dashoff-pa-1996.