In re Dashoff

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dashoff

705 A.2d 1208, 152 N.J. 446, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 124

DecidedFebruary 25, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 705 A.2d 1208 (In re Dashoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dashoff, 705 A.2d 1208, 152 N.J. 446, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 124 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 7, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that A. DAVID DASHOFF of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, and who was suspended from practice for a period of three months by Order of the Court dated November 1, 1995, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from practice for a period of six months for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (fee overreaching), RPC 1.7(a), 1.7(b), and 1.8(a) (conflicts of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that A. DAVID DASHOFF is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[447]*447ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 7, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that A. DAVID DASHOFF of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, and who was suspended from practice for a period of three months by Order of the Court dated November 1, 1995, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from practice for a period of six months for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (fee overreaching), RPC 1.7(a), 1.7(b), and 1.8(a) (conflicts of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that A. DAVID DASHOFF is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[447]*447ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 A.2d 1208, 152 N.J. 446, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dashoff-nj-1998.