In Re Dash

267 B.R. 915, 46 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1606, 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 726, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1250, 2001 WL 1217059
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
DecidedOctober 11, 2001
Docket19-11982
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 267 B.R. 915 (In Re Dash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Dash, 267 B.R. 915, 46 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1606, 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 726, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1250, 2001 WL 1217059 (N.J. 2001).

Opinion

OPINION

RAYMOND T. LYONS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Sylvia C. Dash, debtor, moved to compel General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) to turn over the 2000 Chevrolet Blazer which it repossessed on August 5, 2001. GMAC objected. The issue is when does a lease on a motor vehicle terminate for the purpose of establishing (a) whether the lease is property of the estate and (b) whether the lease is executory and unexpired so that it may be assumed?

This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) 1 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and (b)(1), and the Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dated July *916 23, 1984 referring all cases under Title 11 of the United States Code to the bankruptcy court. Additionally, this is a core proceeding that can be heard and determined by a bankruptcy judge under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

For the reasons set forth below, this court concludes that, under the terms of the New Jersey Consumer Leasing Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:12-60 et seq. and of the lease itself, repossession alone did not terminate the motor vehicle lease. Repossession of the chattel and termination of the lease are separate remedies under the lease. N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:12-65a requires the lessor to mail the lessee written notice in order to terminate the lease for the first or any subsequent default by the lessee, regardless of when or whether the lessor repossessed the vehicle. The lease remains property of the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541 and remains unexpired and assumable under 11 U.S.C. § 365(a).

FACTS

On May 31, 2000 the debtor Sylvia Dash and Agresta Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, agent and lessor, entered a Lease Agreement for a 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. Agres-ta assigned the lease and sold the vehicle to GMAC, which now owns the vehicle.

After the down payment, the debtor was required to pay $349.91 on the 30th of each month for thirty-five months. At a date unspecified, the debtor defaulted under the lease by failing to make monthly payments. On December 5, 2000 GMAC repossessed the vehicle. GMAC sent the debtor a letter dated December 6, 2000 titled “NOTICE OF CANCELLATION AND INTENT TO SELL.” The letter advised the debtor that she was in default for failing to make monthly payments and that she had the right until December 21, 2000 to reinstate the lease by paying $1,282.40. The letter further informed the debtor that the vehicle would be sold at public auction if she did not reinstate the lease by December 21, 2000. The debtor reinstated the lease on December 8, 2000 by making the required payment.

On February 20, 2001 the debtor filed her first voluntary petition in bankruptcy, Chapter 13, under Case Number 01-51798. On May 3, 2001 GMAC filed a Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay because the debtor failed to maintain insurance on the vehicle and failed to make the required payments under the lease. The debtor and GMAC resolved the motion through a Consent Order for Assumption of Lease, which was entered on June 14, 2001. On July 11, 2001 the court dismissed Case Number 01-51798 because the debtor failed to make the required payments to the Chapter 13 trustee.

Once again the debtor fell behind in the payments due under the lease and, on August 5, 2001, GMAC repossessed the vehicle for the second time. On August 7, 2001 at 10:38 a.m. the debtor filed the instant voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 13. The debtor’s attorney certified that he telephoned the attorney for GMAC on August 7, 2001 to advise him of the debtor’s intention to file this petition. The debtor’s attorney telephoned the attorney for GMAC again on August 8, 2001 to advise him that the petition had been filed and to provide a facsimile copy of the filed petition.

GMAC sent the debtor a letter dated August 7, 2001 which stated:

Under the terms of your lease agreement, we have terminated your lease because you are in default.

The letter further stated that GMAC had repossessed the vehicle and would hold it until 9:00 a.m. on August 23, 2001, when it would be sold at public auction. The debt- *917 or demanded by telephone that GMAC return the vehicle, but GMAC refused.

The debtor argues that the lease is exec-utory and unexpired. She states (without specifying a subsection) that the conduct of GMAC violates the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362. The debtor asserts that her lack of transportation may prevent her fulfilling her job requirements (although she does not specify what they are). She seeks an order requiring GMAC to return the vehicle.

GMAC argues that it terminated the lease by repossessing the vehicle before the debtor filed the petition. The lessor does not rely on its August 7, 2001 letter as the event that terminated the lease or claim that the letter was sent before the petition was filed. The lessor asserts that, as the lease has expired, the debtor may not assume or reject it. GMAC also declares that N.J. Stat Ann. § 56:12-65 does not require it to reinstate the lease a second time. GMAC asks the court to deny the debtor’s motion for turnover.

DISCUSSION

The filing of a bankruptcy petition creates an estate that consists of “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). The broad reach of § 541(a)(1) draws into the estate property not in the debtor’s possession when the petition is filed. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc., 462 U.S. 198, 205-206, 103 S.Ct. 2309, 2313-2314, 76 L.Ed.2d 515(1983).

11 U.S.C. § 542(a) requires an entity in control of property that the trustee can “use, sell, or lease under section 363” to turn the property over to the trustee. Following Whiting Pools, the court in Carr v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 130 B.R. 434, 436 (D.N.J.1991) required a secured creditor “in possession of repossessed collateral in which a debtor in bankruptcy has an interest * * * to turn the collateral over to the debtor’s trustee upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition.” In re Attinello, 38 B.R. 609, 610 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1984) (applying the result in Whiting Pools to a Chapter 13 case).

The Chapter 13 debtor has standing to bring an action for turnover of property. 11 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Denby-Peterson
576 B.R. 66 (D. New Jersey, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 B.R. 915, 46 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1606, 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 726, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1250, 2001 WL 1217059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dash-njb-2001.