In re Daryl W.
This text of 73 A.D.3d 792 (In re Daryl W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), dated July 13, 2009, which, after a hearing, and upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated April 17, 2009, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and, upon his consent, placed him on probation for a period of 12 months under stated terms and conditions.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Inasmuch as the appellant expressly consented to the disposition imposed, he is not aggrieved thereby. Since that is the only issue raised on appeal, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Latiyanna M., 62 AD3d 710, 711 [2009]; Matter of Shaheen [793]*793P.J., 29 AD3d 996, 997 [2006]; Matter of Javon H., 28 AD3d 556 [2006]; Matter of Kristina R., 21 AD3d 560 [2005]; Matter of Shamasia M., 4 AD3d 359, 361 [2004]; Matter of Stevenson J., 306 AD2d 412 [2003]; Matter of Nicole G., 274 AD2d 478 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.3d 792, 899 N.Y.S.2d 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daryl-w-nyappdiv-2010.