In re Darrell G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Darrell G.

39 A.D.3d 280, 831 N.Y.S.2d 901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.3d 280 (In re Darrell G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Darrell G., 39 A.D.3d 280, 831 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about October 19, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and menacing in the third degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for a period of nine months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its rejection of appellant’s alibi defense (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about October 19, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and menacing in the third degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for a period of nine months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its rejection of appellant’s alibi defense (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.3d 280, 831 N.Y.S.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-darrell-g-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack