in Re Darrell DeWayne Mason
This text of in Re Darrell DeWayne Mason (in Re Darrell DeWayne Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-16-00338-CR _________________
IN RE DARRELL DEWAYNE MASON
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-17995-0 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Darrell DeWayne Mason filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel
the trial court to allow him to obtain a free reporter’s record, which he desired to
use in conjunction with a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. In his petition,
Mason did not identify what efforts, if any, he made to present his request for a
free reporter’s record to the trial court, and Mason’s petition does not indicate
whether the trial court ruled on his request before he sought mandamus relief.
On September 20, 2016, we informed Mason that his petition did not comply
with the requirements of Rules 52.3 and 52.7(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
1 Procedure, and we gave Mason a thirty-day extension to allow Mason to amend his
petition. Mason did not file an amended petition or supplement the record.
Although provided an opportunity to amend his petition so that it complied
with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Mason failed to amend his petition,
and the petition that is before us does not demonstrate that Mason is entitled to
mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34
S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (holding that to obtain relief in a
mandamus proceeding, a relator must establish that the trial court failed to perform
a ministerial duty, and that the relator has no other adequate legal remedy).
Accordingly, we deny Mason’s petition seeking mandamus relief.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 1, 2016 Opinion Delivered November 2, 2016 Do Not Publish
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Darrell DeWayne Mason, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-darrell-dewayne-mason-texapp-2016.