In re Darling's Estate
This text of 13 N.Y.S. 783 (In re Darling's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An executor or administrator cannot pay the assets to the next of kin in advance of the final settlement. If he do so, and there be costs and charges put upon the estate in an action where the executor or administrator failed to recover, the statute of limitation is no defense to an accounting by the administrator or executor. The executor may be even bound by the statute as between himself-and the heir or next of kin; but it has no relevancy to the petitioners’ claim to be paid out of the estate. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide event.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.Y.S. 783, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-darlings-estate-nysupct-1891.