In re Darby

580 F. App'x 187
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1431
StatusPublished

This text of 580 F. App'x 187 (In re Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Darby, 580 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Darby petitions for a ■writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, on June 27, 2014, the district court granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment on Darby’s § 2255 motion except as to Darby’s claim that counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately advise him regarding a formal plea offer. The court ordered this claim be held in abeyance pending an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on Darby’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-darby-ca4-2014.