in Re: Danny E. Drummond
This text of in Re: Danny E. Drummond (in Re: Danny E. Drummond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN RE: DANNY E. DRUMMOND
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Relator, Danny E. Drummond, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on January 8, 2007, in which he alleges that respondent, the Honorable Rose Vela, Presiding Judge of the 148th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, abused her discretion by making "a clear and prejudicial error of law by failing to submit into the record sufficient evidence or stipulation of evidence to support Relator's plea, where a trial has been waived, which is mandatory. Trial court failed to submit to a jury and prove beyond a reasonable doubt, facts and increase the penalty for a crime beyond statutory minimum at the punishment phase."
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 18th day of January, 2007.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Danny E. Drummond, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-danny-e-drummond-texapp-2007.