In re Danilov

905 A.2d 788, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 2431991
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 24, 2006
DocketNo. 06-BG-906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 905 A.2d 788 (In re Danilov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Danilov, 905 A.2d 788, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 2431991 (D.C. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Ser-guei Danilov, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, and the letter from Bar Counsel dated August 4, 2006, advising the Court that Bar Counsel does not take exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 24th day of August, 2006

ORDERED that the said Serguei Dan-ilov, is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving the respondent notice of the provisions of Rule XI, § 14(g), and § 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply with these provisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Brandes
42 A.D.3d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 A.2d 788, 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 2431991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-danilov-dc-2006.