In re Daniels
This text of 403 F. App'x 831 (In re Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jimmie Craig Daniels petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied Daniels’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Daniels’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Daniels’ motion for release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 F. App'x 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniels-ca4-2010.