In Re Danielle Robbins v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Danielle Robbins v. the State of Texas (In Re Danielle Robbins v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-23-00640-CV
IN RE Danielle ROBBINS
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 26, 2023
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 30, 2023, Relator Danielle Robbins filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After
considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief
sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied as moot. Real party in interest DoorDash Inc.’s
motion for joinder is denied as moot.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI21886, styled David Ybarra and Andres Hernandez Garcia v. Danielle Robbins and DoorDash, Inc., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presided over the orders at issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Danielle Robbins v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-danielle-robbins-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.