In re Danielle R.
This text of 239 A.D.2d 305 (In re Danielle R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about April 15, 1996, which denied respondent’s motion to vacate her default at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, resulting in an order entered April 11, 1996, terminating her parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to vacate her default since her moving papers failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her absence or a meritorious defense (see, Matter of "Male” Jones, 128 AD2d 403). Her claim of illness was properly rejected since •her submissions failed to establish that she was ill on the day of the proceedings, particularly in light of her previous failure to appear. No meritorious defense was established, since despite petitioners’ concerted efforts, respondent failed to complete either a parenting skills class or a drug rehabilita[306]*306tion program, and the evidence adduced demonstrated that the children’s best interests were served by the termination of respondent’s parental rights (Matter of Male J., 214 AD2d 417). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D.2d 305, 658 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-danielle-r-nyappdiv-1997.