In re Danielle L.

269 A.D.2d 704, 703 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 24, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 704 (In re Danielle L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Danielle L., 269 A.D.2d 704, 703 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (Duggan, J.), entered September 29, 1998, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Danielle L. an abandoned child.

Respondent, who is currently incarcerated, is the biological father of Danielle L. (born in 1984), who has been in petitioner’s custody since December 1995. Danielle’s mother voluntarily surrendered her parental rights following this placement and, in March 1998, petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to terminate respondent’s parental rights upon the ground that respondent had abandoned his daughter. Following a fact-finding hearing, Family Court found clear and convincing evidence that respondent had abandoned his daughter and issued an order terminating respondent’s parental rights.

On this appeal by respondent, his counsel asserts that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised before this Court. Upon our review of the record, the brief submitted by respondent’s counsel and the letters submitted by respondent and the Law Guardian for Danielle L., we agree. Accordingly, we affirm Family Court’s order and relieve respondent’s counsel of his assignment (see, e.g., Matter of Kaleb U., 251 AD2d 923; see also, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mariani v. Morgan
101 A.D.3d 1179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 704, 703 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-danielle-l-nyappdiv-2000.