In re Daniel X.
This text of 63 A.D.3d 1213 (In re Daniel X.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Saratoga County (Hall, J.), entered March 24, 2008, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for violation of an order.
Fetitioner, the biological mother of Daniel X. (born in 1994), commenced this proceeding in March 2008 alleging that Daniel’s adoptive parents violated the terms of the 1998 judicial surrender by denying her visitation with that child. Family Court, noting no appearance by either party, dismissed petitioner’s application for lack of jurisdiction and this appeal ensued.
A biological parent may seek to enforce the conditions of a judicial surrender by filing a petition in Family Court (see Social Services Law § 383-c). Here, Family Court did not specify in the order the jurisdictional basis—subject matter or personal—for dismissal. In any event, as there was no appearance by petitioner and, as this record does not demonstrate that service upon respondents was effectuated in order for personal jurisdiction to have been attained, we do not disagree with the dismissal of the petition.
Feters, Lahtinen, Kane and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner commenced a similar proceeding in March 2008 regarding her son Stephen X. (born in 1989), which Family Court also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and, upon appeal, this Court affirmed (Matter of Stephen X., 59 AD3d 792 [2009]). The record further reflects that petitioner commenced a related proceeding involving both children in April 2004, which also was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 A.D.3d 1213, 879 N.Y.S.2d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-x-nyappdiv-2009.