Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Daniel Williams D.

In re Daniel Williams D.

82 A.D.3d 882, 918 N.Y.2d 382
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 A.D.3d 882 (In re Daniel Williams D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Daniel Williams D., 82 A.D.3d 882, 918 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying her request for an adjournment in order to present the testimony of a caseworker. The mother failed to subpoena the caseworker, although she had ample opportunity to do so, and she only speculated that the caseworker would offer testimony favorable to her (see Matter of Kaseem J., 52 AD3d 1321 [2008]; Matter of Alexander James R., 48 AD3d 820 [2008]; Matter of Alexa Ray R., 276 AD2d 703 [2000]). Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Julian J.C.
96 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 882, 918 N.Y.2d 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-williams-d-nyappdiv-2011.