in Re Daniel Rodriguez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 17, 2010
Docket14-10-00367-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Daniel Rodriguez v. State (in Re Daniel Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Daniel Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed as Moot and Memorandum Opinion filed June 17, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00358-CR

NO. 14-10-00367-CR

IN RE DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 21, 2010, Relator, Daniel Rodriguez, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.  The petitioner asks this court to order the respondents, the Honorable Larry Standley, presiding judge of County Criminal Court at Law No. 6, Harris County, Texas, and Loren Jackson, District Clerk of Harris County, to “issue a writ of mandamus ordering the application for a writ of habeas corpus filed or in the alternative ordering that the appeal be reinstated and record sent to this court.”

Relator filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court seeking release from a 1996 misdemeanor conviction for driving while intoxicated.  The trial court denied relator’s application, and relator attempted to appeal the denial.  The trial court, however, denied appellant’s notice of appeal.

On June 1, 2010, the trial court withdrew its previous order denying relator’s right to appeal.  The court further ordered the Harris County District Clerk to immediately assemble and transmit the clerk’s record to this court.  

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Frost, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Daniel Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2010.