In Re Daniel Palomo, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Daniel Palomo, Jr. v. the State of Texas (In Re Daniel Palomo, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 2, 2025
No. 04-25-00113-CR
IN RE Daniel PALOMO, Jr.
Original Proceeding 1 0F
ORDER
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
On February 20, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the attached appendix, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on April 2, 2025.
_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of April, 2025.
_____________________________ Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CRD-000332-D2, styled State of Texas v. Daniel Palomo, Jr., pending in the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joel B. Johnson presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Daniel Palomo, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-palomo-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.