In re Daniel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Daniel

849 A.2d 565, 180 N.J. 156

DecidedJune 4, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 849 A.2d 565 (In re Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Daniel, 849 A.2d 565, 180 N.J. 156 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-238, concluding that CORNELIUS W. DANIEL, III, of POINT PLEASANT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to extent reasonably necessary to permit client to make informed decision), and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentation);

[157]*157And respondent having been ordered to show cause before this Court why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CORNELIUS W. DANIEL, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI