in Re Daniel Montes, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 2022·No. 03-22-00738-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00738-CV

In Re Daniel Montes, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator is a vexatious litigant and has filed a document, which we treat as a

petition for writ of mandamus based on the substance of his filing, challenging the order of the

local administrative judge denying Relator’s request for leave to file a motion to vacate the

prefiling order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.101, .102; see also Surgitek, Bristol-

Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (considering the substance of pleading

rather than form or caption to determine its nature). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Relator’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is also denied.

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: November 29, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Daniel Montes, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Daniel Montes, Jr. (in Re Daniel Montes, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel
997 S.W.2d 598 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)