In re Daniel L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Daniel L.

302 A.D.2d 321, 757 N.Y.S.2d 4, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 321 (In re Daniel L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Daniel L., 302 A.D.2d 321, 757 N.Y.S.2d 4, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J., upon fact-finding determination of Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2000, adjudging the subject child neglected by respondent upon findings of excessive corporal punishment and verbal abuse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings that respondent inflicted excessive corporal punishment and verbally abused the child are adequately supported by the child’s out-of-court statements that respondent repeatedly hit him with various objects and disparaged him with epithets, as testified to by petitioner’s caseworker and corroborated by the caseworker’s observation of a bruise on the child’s face (see Matter of R./W. Children, 240 AD2d 207 [1997]). No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s findings of credibility (see Matter of Samantha S., 296 AD2d 327 [2002]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J., upon fact-finding determination of Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2000, adjudging the subject child neglected by respondent upon findings of excessive corporal punishment and verbal abuse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings that respondent inflicted excessive corporal punishment and verbally abused the child are adequately supported by the child’s out-of-court statements that respondent repeatedly hit him with various objects and disparaged him with epithets, as testified to by petitioner’s caseworker and corroborated by the caseworker’s observation of a bruise on the child’s face (see Matter of R./W. Children, 240 AD2d 207 [1997]). No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s findings of credibility (see Matter of Samantha S., 296 AD2d 327 [2002]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 321, 757 N.Y.S.2d 4, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daniel-l-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack